| With
reference to your article in Nanyang Siang Pau on 23rd January 1999,
we wish to bring your attention to the serious flaws in the management
of transportation facilities in Malaysia. In your article,
you painted a grandeur picture of the transport infrastructure in the country
and the readiness to meeting the needs of the country when we enter the
21st century.
We beg to differ with you
on this view of the future, and wish to share with you our frustration
of the present serious gap between vision and reality. There are
a number of issues, which we believe have not received adequate attention
from your ministry, and government leaders seem only interested in talking
about grandeur plans, than devoting time and effort to ensuring the system
works efficiently.
We would like to highlight two urgent problems
the Rakyat experienced for your attention:
1. Management
is more Important
Waving
the latest state of the art physical infrastructure is one thing, making
them work is another. Undoubtedly the infrastructure in the country
has improved tremendously after billions of dollars of investments have
gone into these projects.
However, these investments
-- built by the people's hard-earned savings -- had not optimized conveniences
and help to improve productivity. At the core of this is a MANAGEMENT
issue.
You mentioned the Ministry's
effort in getting ISO 9000 certification. What is the point if the mentality
is to get an ISO certification, and not walking the talk, i.e. actually
delivering first class service?
We suggest a more realistic
and practical barometer of gauging efficiency by a weekly people's opinion
poll. Aferall the projects are funded by the people, it is only natural
that the people expect good service. For now, the impression one
gets is the authorities seem only too interested in building the infrastructure
and NOT to make sure they work.
For example, a road user
would tell you there is tremendous confusion on road signs along the highways.
The Ministry will find out for itself if officers are sent out onto the
roads to survey these signs. These signs are confusing and do not
serve their intended purpose for Malaysians, not to mention tourists and
foreigners.
2. People and Market
Orientation
You
said that the transportation system has become sophisticated.
With
all the gleaming infrastructure, the reality is KL-ites find the transportation
links worse and more expensive than before.
For example, someone in Kepong
who goes to work could rely on the mini buses in the past, now she has
to take a taxi everyday. A student woke up on a public holiday having
to go back to school for extra-curricular practices has to wait hours for
the INTRAKOTA buses. These are very real problems, which caused stress
and frustration, not to mention money and reduced productivity.
That picture-perfect situation
you mentioned in your article is too far from reality. Serious
and disciplined efforts are required to rectify the management problems
of the entire infrastructure. As one reads your article, one only
get a sense of cynicism and an impression that the Ministry is so out of
touch with reality.
The priorities of the moment
may be building less but work the existing system to its maximum, and pay
more attention to ensuring that these infrastructure actually help the
people in their lives.
We hope this feedback will be
viewed seriously, and attempts are made to improve the efficient running
of the system.
Kuala Lumpur, January
24 1999
 |