Reorganizing and Rebuilding the Pig Farming Industry affected by the NIPAH Viral Encephalitis Epidemic
Federation of Livestock Farmers Association Malaysia Endorsed and Supported by Malaysian Pork Consumers & Community Organizations |
|
|
there is sunlight, the sunflowers will bloom. So long
|
Waste
Management and Pig Health Management in New PFAs
by Task Force Of Federation of Livestock Farmers' Association 1.1 All farms in the new Pig Farming Areas (PFAs) must fulfill the declared tertiary effluent standards by the authority as shown below:- Table1: Effluent Standards
Besides complying with the these technical standards, new PFAs are to be established in areas where farming does not cause public nuisance or communal sensitivities and above all the pig farming is compatible with the economic and commercial activities of the surrounding areas. Palm oil cropping, rubber planting, unused ex-mined land and forest areas are deemed compatible. 1.2 Practices in the existing pig farms generate up to 40 litre of waste water per SPP daily. Such large volume increases the cost for any waste water management system to comply with the effluent standards. Also many of the existing farms do not have separate rainwater/ storm water collection system, and therefore this rainwater also overloads the waste water system. Therefore, in the new PFAs, irrespective of the technology and waste management system used, the following principles apply:-
Therefore, it is imperative that the layout of the farm and the designs of the pens and the barns should not require the excessive water usage. The initial cost of such pens and housing will be higher, but there will be saving in the installation and operation costs of the waste management system. The various waste management systems and the variety of configurations and combinations is best left to the experts and consultant companies. The consultants will design a system tailored to the farm’s need, but they have to optimise cost and take full considerations of the principles listed in paragraph 1.2 of this paper. If land cost is low to moderate, a land-extensive system (eg. lagoons system) will be economical and normally operates with less technical hindrances. 1.4 Waste management incurs costs. However, waste resource recovery (eg. fertilizers production) could offset certain costs. The cost per pig marketed will depend on the system used and the cost-efficiency of the system. This could vary from 5% to 10% of the total production cost of a pig. It is envisaged that a system for a single small farm (say below 1,000 SPP) may be completely uneconomical. The principle of economies of scale applies in waste water management. Technology in pig farm waste management improves rapidly. New technologies and new systems are adding on fast. There are such high variations in initial installation costs and the subsequent running costs. It is necessary that a system of optimum cost for that farm be tailored made accordingly. A word of caution is that often “a farm waste management takes time (probably at least 6 months operation after full pig population) to stabilise and prove its true efficiency and real worth. Thus, payment to the consultants should take recognition of the prolonged “maturing period of a system”. 2.1 The very high concentration of pigs in a very intensive farming system in a new PFA poses the greatest challenge to the veterinarians to keep diseases at controllable levels. Adopting this system of farming pigs is against the logical principles in disease control. However, the industry expects the ingenuity of the technical personnels to prove their worth. Also, this is where the discipline of farmers will be most vital to safeguard against scourge from disease infections. For practical purpose, all the farm units together within a PFA is a “single very big farm” in term of herd health. In most of the existing farms, the farmers always source pigs from farms without concern about the health status of the supplier farms. Then these pigs are brought into their farms without quarantine. Such risk has been amply proven by the spreading of the so many introduced exotic diseases over the last two decades, the outbreak of the coronaviral gastroenteritis in 1994, and of course the Nipah virus infection in 1998/1999. That exotic diseases have been repeatedly introduced with ease served to show that the health requirement for importation of live animals is laxed. There is the urgent need to continuously review such importation health requirements. If such weaknesses persist within the PFA’s, the catastrophic effects of diseases would be amplified. On the other hand, the establishment of new PFA’s would provide the opportunity to create relatively disease free herds or even some specific diseases free herds. 2.2 In the implementation of the PFA programme, the following issues require very serious attention, and deserves compulsory adoption in the management of each PFA. They are:-
Feedback
Welcomed!
Please circulate to fellow Malaysians. |
|
![]() |